DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003834209-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-04-06

000105799

Contested design: 003834209-0004

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 003834209-0004 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Sourceable Limitedvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

91-93 Great Eastern Street, City of London EC2A 3HZ, United Kingdom

Represented by

Gunnercooke LLP

Holder · RCD owner

Made.com Design Limitedvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

5 Singer Street, London EC2A 4BQ, United Kingdom

Represented by

Bird & Bird LLP

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

sideboard

https://www.instagram.com · Instagram · disclosed 2017-01-16

Web disclosureD2

sideboard

https://twitter.com · Twitter · disclosed 2017-03-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) CDR, arguing the contested sideboard lacked individual character over two earlier sideboard designs disclosed online.
  • The holder disputed disclosure of both prior designs, argued the evidence was incomplete, and maintained the contested RCD created a different overall impression in a crowded sideboard design corpus.
  • The Division accepted D1 and D2 as disclosed via the dated Instagram and Twitter posts, despite rejecting undated website screenshots as proof of disclosure.
  • Comparing the designs, the Division found significant differences in proportions, compartment layout, and legs, so the contested RCD retained individual character and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127357

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000127356

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-12Art 25(1)(b)067
000127340

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-06Art 25(1)(b)067
000121199

vs MANUTTI BVBA

2024-05-16Art 25(1)(b)067
000120920

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120868

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120869

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120918

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067