DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006036075-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-04-20

000106079

Contested design: 006036075-0003

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for invalidity against registered Community design No 006036075-0003 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

1. La demande en nullité à l'encontre du dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré nº 006036075-0003 est rejetée. 2. La demanderesse supporte les frais exposés par la titulaire, fixés à 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Saverglassvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

3, Rue de la Gare, 60960 Feuquières, France

Represented by

Novagraaf France

Holder · RCD owner

Verallia Packagingvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Tour CARPE DIEM place des Corolles - Esplanade Nord, 92400 Courbevoie, France

Represented by

T Mark Conseils

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

bottles ("Flavour")

RCD No 001949355-0001 · Bulletin des dessins ou modèles communautaires · disclosed 2011-11-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b), arguing the contested bottle lacked novelty and individual character over its earlier RCD No 001949355-0001.
  • The holder argued the bottles differed in transparency, shoulder slope, neck, body, base and other visible features, producing a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD but found the designs were not identical and that their shared features were common bottle features with limited weight.
  • The contested design retained individual character, so the invalidity application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberJessica Norma LEWIS
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127595

vs Shenzhen Beipengxing Technology Co., Ltd

2025-04-15Art 25(1)(b)097
000126496

vs Jiangmen Xinhui Zhenghua Ironware Co., Ltd.

2025-03-07Art 25(1)(b)097
000119700

vs Guohua He

2023-10-29Art 25(1)(b)097
000119221

vs Aniceto Canamasas Puigbo

2023-10-22Art 25(1)(b)097
000121263

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121318

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121320

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121319

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097