DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006387353-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-04-30

000109365

Contested design: 006387353-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; RCD No 006387353-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 006387353-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Wu Bovia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 69, Nanji Great Avenue, Wuhu Farm St., Huangpi Dist., Wuhan, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

A.BRE.MAR. S.R.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Meizai CHENvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.1, Lane 8, Dongfangbenggang Village, Songgang, Bao’an District, Shenzhen, 518000, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

Chinese design patent for hooks for hanging

China · disclosed 2018-03-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying at least on an earlier Chinese design patent published before the contested RCD filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply, so the applicant’s factual and legal case went undefended.
  • The Division found the earlier design was publicly disclosed under Article 7 and that designer freedom for hooks remained broadly unconstrained apart from basic functional requirements.
  • It held the designs created the same overall impression because their shapes, proportions and hook positioning were identical, while colour and reverse-side sticker differences carried little weight.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088