DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003480284-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-06-10

000107759

Contested design: 003480284-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against RCD No 0034802840001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0034802840001 è respinta. 2. La richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla titolare, fissate a 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Seven S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Fornacino 96, 10040 Leini (TO), Italia

Holder · RCD owner

A&F S.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Aurelio Saffi 17, 20123 Milano, Italia

Represented by

Bugnion S.p.A.

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

backpack transport trolley

RCD No 1958091-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2012-12-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and, at least, individual character over earlier RCD No 1958091-0001, arguing wheel features were technically dictated.
  • The holder argued the contested trolley shell differed in base shape, rear cavities, wheel covering, and wheel profile, creating a distinct overall impression.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD, identified the informed user as a user of backpack trolleys, and found author freedom limited mainly by functional constraints such as wheels and support structure.
  • Focusing on the visible rear and side views in normal use, the Division found multiple non-technical differences in the base and back panel, so the contested design had individual character and the invalidity application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJessica LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000113981

vs Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd

2022-04-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000104359

vs Lohia e-mobility GmbH

2020-06-23Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000107760

vs A & F S.r.l.

2020-06-04Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000103799

vs LT Fördertechnik

2019-11-04Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000102599

vs Tecnimoem Care, S.L.

2019-10-10Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000103619

vs Airwheel Europe S. A.

2019-09-17Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000011186

vs LA MARE Spółka z o.o.

2019-08-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000104299

vs Milan Bříštěla

2019-07-29Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128