DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006601514-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-07-06

000109581

Contested design: 006601514-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder’s costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0066015140001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

von Heesen GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Eversgerdweg 64, 33332 Gütersloh, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Yingxiao QIU

China (CN)

Room 1203, Building No.5, Shijichuncheng Four Phase, Meilong Road, Longhua New District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, 518000, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

wallet design shown in Amazon.de screenshots/extracts submitted by the applicant

www.amazon.de · Amazon.de

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

second wallet design shown in Amazon.de screenshots/extracts submitted by the applicant

www.amazon.de · Amazon.de

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) for lack of novelty and individual character over several earlier wallet designs shown on Amazon.de.
  • Holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division found the Amazon extracts and screenshots illegible, incomplete, and not reliably linkable to the alleged disclosure data.
  • Because disclosure under Article 7 was not proven, the Division did not assess novelty or individual character and rejected the application.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124157

vs Invented Here B.V.

2025-03-07Art 25(1)(b)037
000124416

vs Wenbo Huang

2025-01-28Art 25(1)(b)037
000121569

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-06-12Art 25(1)(b)037
000121529

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-31Art 25(1)(b)037
000121525

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-24Art 25(1)(b)037
000121526

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-24Art 25(1)(b)037
000121528

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-23Art 25(1)(b)037
000121568

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-23Art 25(1)(b)037