DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006601514-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-07-08

000109683

Contested design: 006601514-0002

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0066015140002 is rejected. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

von Heesen GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Eversgerdweg 64, 33332 Gütersloh, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Yingxiao QIU

China (CN)

Room 1203, Building No.5, Shijichuncheng Four Phase, Meilong Road, Longhua New District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, 518000, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

wallet design offered on Amazon

www.amazon.de

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

another wallet design offered on Amazon

www.amazon.de

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on several earlier wallet designs allegedly disclosed on Amazon.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division found the Amazon material illegible and incomplete, so the alleged earlier designs were not proven disclosed under Article 7 CDR.
  • Because disclosure of the prior designs was not established, the invalidity application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124157

vs Invented Here B.V.

2025-03-07Art 25(1)(b)037
000124416

vs Wenbo Huang

2025-01-28Art 25(1)(b)037
000121569

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-06-12Art 25(1)(b)037
000121529

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-31Art 25(1)(b)037
000121525

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-24Art 25(1)(b)037
000121526

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-24Art 25(1)(b)037
000121528

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-23Art 25(1)(b)037
000121568

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-23Art 25(1)(b)037