DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006581245-0014

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-08-12

000110326

Contested design: 006581245-0014

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicants must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno/modello comunitario registrato n 6581245-0014 è respinta. 2. I richiedenti sopportano l’onere delle spese sostenute dal titolare, fissate a 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Dado Ceramica s.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Sicilia, 21, San Giovanni in Prisceto (BO) Italia

Represented by

Stefano Querzè

Holder · RCD owner

Italcer S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Emilia Ovest, 53/A, 42048 Rubiera (RE) Italia

Represented by

Bugnion S.p.A.

Prior art cited (4)

CatalogD1⚠ rejected as evidence

Ferrara tile model

Star Gres catalog and invoice (Annexes 1-A and 1-B) · disclosed 2006-11-30

CatalogD2⚠ rejected as evidence

Savona tile model

Star Gres catalog and invoice (Annexes 1-A and 1-B) · disclosed 2006-11-30

CatalogD3⚠ rejected as evidence

Villa Toscana tile model

Star Gres catalog (Annex 1-A)

National designD4

tile

UK design No. 1051901 · DesignView / UK design publication · disclosed 1988-06-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicants argued the contested tile design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier Star Gres tile models Ferrara, Savona and Villa Toscana, and over UK design No. 1051901.
  • The holder filed no observations in response.
  • The Division found the catalog, invoice, price list, links and file screenshots insufficient to prove disclosure of D1 to D3 under Article 7 CDR.
  • It accepted disclosure of UK design No. 1051901 but found the contested design created a different overall impression because of its mosaic square tesserae and grout pattern.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicants.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI – ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJessica LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130245

vs G.B.S., s.r.o.

2026-01-20Art 25(1)(b)257
000130202

vs SC PAMABA SRL

2025-12-16Art 25(1)(b)257
000127997

vs Peng Zhang

2025-12-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000127959

vs Peng Zhang

2025-12-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000127897

vs Saunasell OÜ

2025-11-07Art 25(1)(b)257
000127935

vs Saunasell OÜ

2025-11-07Art 25(1)(b)257
000127898

vs Saunasell OÜ

2025-10-20Art 25(1)(b)257
000124782

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25Art 25(1)(b)257