DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007373626-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-09-21

000110521

Contested design: 007373626-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 007373626-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Cutelarias Cristema, LDA.via PDF extraction

Portugal (PT)

Rua dos Lameiros, nº 577 e 605, 4805-619 Guimarães, Portugal

Represented by

Paulo Rui Da Silva Pelayo de Sousa Henriques

Holder · RCD owner

Francisco do Carmo Silva Mota

Portugal (PT)

Lugar do Largatal - Edifício do Montinho, 33, 2º dto., Caldas das Taipas, 4800-370 Guimarães, Portugal

Represented by

Vera Alves

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use⚠ rejected as evidence

Meat chopping hatchet allegedly identical to the contested design and sold on the Portuguese market before the filing date

Invoices No 31/2014A, 24/2015, 16/2016, 3856 and 03/24417; declarations in documents 4 and 6-9 · Portugal market invoices and declarations

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant claimed a hatchet identical to the contested design had been sold in Portugal before the filing date and relied on invoices and declarations about prior sales.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division held that the invoices proved sales of hatchets but not, through solid and objective evidence, the appearance of an earlier design corresponding to the declarations' images.
  • Because prior disclosure of an earlier design was not proven under Article 7, the novelty attack under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 5(1)(b) failed and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)087
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)087
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)087
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)087
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)087
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)087
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)087
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)087