DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002945857-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-11-04

000108002

Contested design: 002945857-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0029458570001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ahaljan Duraiappahvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Geibelplatz 7, 30173 Hannover, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Tong De Limitedvia PDF extraction

VG

Palm Grove House, P. O. Box 438, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

screwdriver

ASIN B01AFZ6W9C · Amazon.de · disclosed 2016-01-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested screwdriver design lacked novelty and individual character over an Amazon-listed prior design sold under ASIN B01AFZ6W9C since 11 January 2016.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not rebut the applicant's disclosure evidence or merits arguments.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon screenshot as sufficient disclosure and found the contested design created the same overall impression despite rear-side differences and engravings.
  • The application was upheld because the contested RCD lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR and was declared invalid in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088