DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005658507-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-02-23

000108343

Contested design: 005658507-0005

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is allowed, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the proprietor must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1.the application for a declaration of invalidity is allowed. 2.declares registered Community design-No 005658507 to be invalid. 3. orders the proprietor to bear the costs incurred by the applicant, which are fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Out of the Blue KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Beim Neum Damm 28, 28865 Lilienthal, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Mydo GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Osterfeldstraße 6, 22529 Hamburg, Germany

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

Wind cat shown in multiple colours in Diminuto Cielo social-media posts.

Diminuto Cielo Facebook and Instagram posts · disclosed 2015-02-28

Web disclosureD2

Wind cat shown in front, side and rear views in a Diminuto Cielo Instagram post.

Diminuto Cielo Instagram post · disclosed 2015-01-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested wind-cat design lacked novelty and individual character because substantially identical cat designs had been disclosed online before 25 September 2018.
  • The holder disputed proof of disclosure, challenged the evidential value of the annexes, and argued that colour, surface structure, and missing rear and side views distinguished the contested design.
  • The Division accepted the late-filed annexes, found prior online disclosure of D1 and D2 proven under Article 7, and treated internet and social-media publications as valid prior disclosures.
  • Comparing the overall impressions, the Division found the contested design essentially identical to D1 and D2, so it lacked individual character and had to be declared invalid in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberALVARO SOCMERINO
  • MemberClaudia schlie

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

11.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130246

vs Giuliana FERRAROTTI

2026-05-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000131904

vs Lang Huang

2026-04-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126958

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126957

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126956

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126975

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000127536

vs Shuxun Dai

2025-03-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000124515

vs Heinrich Braun

2025-03-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118