DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005792553-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-03-05

000108019

Contested design: 005792553-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0057925530001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Serasar GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Pleistalstr. 228a, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Hongde Xian

China (CN)

No 7, 24 Street, Weizai Luoge Village Nanzhuang, Chancheng District, Guangdong, Foshan, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

A.BRE.MAR. S.R.L.

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

bracelet clasp design sold on Amazon

ASIN B07 D6X Z1YQ · Amazon.de · disclosed 2018-05-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that it had sold bracelets on Amazon for years with the same clasp and that the earlier disclosed design destroyed the contested RCD's novelty and individual character.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and did not contest the applicant's disclosure evidence or substantive comparison.
  • After the Board had already confirmed disclosure of the Amazon prior design, the Division assessed individual character, found broad designer freedom for bracelet clasps, and compared only features visible in the contested RCD.
  • Differences in finish, the SERASAR word mark, and minor hidden closure details did not alter the overall impression, so the application was upheld and the RCD invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

11.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130246

vs Giuliana FERRAROTTI

2026-05-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000131904

vs Lang Huang

2026-04-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126958

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126957

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126956

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126975

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000127536

vs Shuxun Dai

2025-03-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000124515

vs Heinrich Braun

2025-03-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118