DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007195672-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-20

000110941

Contested design: 007195672-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0071956720001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Rodin Textil SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

str. Turda nr. 127, bl. 2, sc. C, ap. 91, sector 1, Bucharest, Romania

Represented by

Cristina Adriana Vultur

Holder · RCD owner

Hakan Tekstil Inter S.R.L.via PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Sat Dobroești, Comuna Dobroești, Str. Stejarului, Nr. 14C, CAMERA 2, Bloc 1, Etaj 2, Apartament 9., Ilfov, Romania

Represented by

Adrian Căvescu

Prior art cited (1)

Catalog⚠ rejected as evidence

two similar curtain-heading strip designs

OZAK DAR DOKUMA catalogue and website

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 6Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested curtain-heading design lacked novelty and individual character in light of two similar 2019 designs shown in OZAK DAR DOKUMA catalogue and website materials.
  • The holder filed no timely admissible reply; its later claim that a faxed response had been sent was unsupported, so the late reply was declared inadmissible.
  • The Division held the applicant failed to prove with solid and objective evidence that the earlier designs were disclosed before 6 November 2019, despite the catalogue being dated 2019.
  • Because disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR was not proven, the invalidity ground under Article 25(1)(b) failed and the application was rejected with costs against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.10

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127357

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000127356

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-12Art 25(1)(b)067
000127340

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-06Art 25(1)(b)067
000121199

vs MANUTTI BVBA

2024-05-16Art 25(1)(b)067
000120918

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120869

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120920

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120919

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067