DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008210629-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-28

000114381

Contested design: 008210629-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0082106290001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

WARIMEX Waren-Import Export Handels-GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Chiara-Ambra-Platz 1, 77743 Neuried, Germany

Represented by

Die Patenterie GbR

Holder · RCD owner

Ningbo Let It Be Arts and Crafts Co.,Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Dongya Village Qiuai Town Yinzhou District, Ningbo, People's Republic of China

Represented by

David Evans

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

hair brush

Community design No 081892290005 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2020-10-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier Community hair-brush designs registered in its name.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and left the invalidity claims undefended.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of earlier Community design No 081892290005 through its bulletin publication before the contested filing date.
  • It found the designs produced the same overall impression, with only a minor rhomboid surface pattern difference, insufficient to confer individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was invalidated in full, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

04.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131844

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000130166

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000131548

vs Wenwei Ding

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000131585

vs NOVOWISE LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000129185

vs Wenzhou Lingzhan Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
0001288952025-07-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000127815

vs Daniel-Vasile Ilie

2025-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048