Invalidity · first instance · 2021-05-03
000110687
Contested design: 006371126-0004
Outcome
The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006371126-0004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Domino Polska Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością spółka komandytowavia PDF extraction
Poland (PL)
ul. Rzeźnicza 4, 58-200 Dzierżoniów, Poland
Represented by
Bartosz Szczepaniak
Holder · RCD owner
Schaffner Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Spółka Komandytowa
Poland (PL)
ul. Floriańska 37/1, 31-019 Kraków, Poland
Represented by
Marek Mikosza
Prior art cited (9)
door handle
RCD No 003241124-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2016-06-29
door handle
RCD No 001283816-0002 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2011-07-19
door handle
RCD No 002405381-0077 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2016-08-17
door handle
RCD No 003241124-0002 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2016-06-29
door handle
RCD No 005302817-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2018-06-18
door handle
RCD No 005302841-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2018-06-18
Qubik design door handle disclosed in applicant catalogues and Rothkin materials
Domino catalogues and Rothkin website/catalogue
Gustaw design door handle disclosed in applicant catalogues and Rothkin materials
Domino catalogues and Rothkin website/catalogue
Chinese patent design for a door handle
CN303910749S · Chinese patent publication · disclosed 2016-11-16
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on six earlier RCDs, Qubik and Gustaw catalogue and website disclosures, and later a Chinese patent publication.
- ›The holder argued designer freedom for door handles was narrow, market trends mattered, and catalogue printouts were unreliable without notarial authentication; it also objected to the Chinese patent evidence as untranslated.
- ›The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier published RCDs, found the Chinese patent inadmissible because it was not invoked in the application, and did not need to assess the remaining market evidence.
- ›It held that door-handle shape allowed broad designer freedom and that the contested design created the same overall impression as D1 despite only minor differences.
- ›The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.
Deciding panel
- MemberLudmila CELISOVA
- MemberElisabetta FERRARO
- MemberNatascha GALPERIN
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000131944 vs Jinsong Liu | 2026-04-29 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 08 | 8 |
| 000128757 vs Axue Jin | 2026-03-11 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 08 | 8 |
| 000127246 vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG | 2026-03-05 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 08 | 8 |
| 000127279 vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG | 2026-03-05 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 08 | 8 |
| 000127243 vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG | 2026-03-05 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 08 | 8 |
| 000127245 vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG | 2026-03-05 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 08 | 8 |
| 000127244 vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG | 2026-03-05 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 08 | 8 |
| 000127241 vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG | 2026-02-27 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 08 | 8 |