DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002439935-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-05-05

000114221

Contested design: 002439935-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0024399350001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Van Huet Glastransport Polska spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnościąvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Nadrzeczna 1, 24262 Kolonia-Poczesna, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Adam Pasternak

Poland (PL)

ul. Egejska 11/76, 02764 Warszawa, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD3

transport rack for sheets of glass

Annex 3 YouTube video stills · YouTube · disclosed 2012-07-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, arguing that four earlier designs disclosed before 4 April 2014 anticipated or produced the same overall impression.
  • The holder filed observations out of time, so its response was not taken into account and it did not rebut the disclosure evidence.
  • The Division accepted Annex 3 as proving disclosure of prior design D3 through YouTube video stills published on 31 July 2012.
  • The Division found broad designer freedom within functional constraints and concluded that the contested design and D3 created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088