DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003315571-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-06-15

000112926

Contested design: 003315571-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 003315571-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Heco Nordiska Aktiebolagvia PDF extraction

Sweden (SE)

Rocknevägen 16, 335 73 Hillerstorp, Sweden

Holder · RCD owner

Troldtekt A/S

Denmark (DK)

Sletvej 2A, 8310 Tranbjerg J., Denmark

Prior art cited (1)

Catalog

Ejot DDS Screw

Ejot product catalogue 'ETICS Anchors' · Ejot product catalogue 'ETICS Anchors'

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over the earlier Ejot DDS Screw, relying mainly on catalogue evidence said to predate the 2016 filing.
  • The holder disputed disclosure and argued the compared screw heads differed in material, shape, pattern, proportions, and visible appearance, so the prior design did not invalidate the RCD.
  • The Division accepted appendix A as sufficient proof of prior disclosure, rejected the novelty claim because the pattern differences were more than immaterial, but found the overall impression remained too similar for informed users.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(b) CDR in conjunction with Article 4 CDR, and the contested RCD was declared invalid with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088