DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004674687-0008

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-06-28

000114661

Contested design: 004674687-0008

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0046746870008 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Michael Heunemannvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Heinrich-Heine-Str. 16, 08491 Limbach, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Tong de Limitedvia PDF extraction

VG

Palm Grove House, P. O. Box 438, Road Town, Tortola, Virgin Islands (British)

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

Lesoleil HSS Drill Bit

ASIN BO12Z3HIW2 · amazon.de · disclosed 2015-07-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 7(1)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier Lesoleil HSS Drill Bit sold on amazon.de before the RCD filing date.
  • The applicant relied on Amazon product-page printouts, the ASIN listing, and pre-filing customer reviews to prove prior disclosure.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence as proving disclosure and found the differences in the shank details immaterial, so both designs created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs of EUR 750 were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088