DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008247332-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-08-05

000114926

Contested design: 008247332-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder’s costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008247332-0001 is rejected. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Antonio Puig, S.Avia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Plaza Europa, 46-48, 08902, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Represented by

Plasseraud IP

Holder · RCD owner

Zou Chunliang

China (CN)

BLDG21 2T-502, Yunshan County, Congyun Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (4)

International designDesign 1

male torso-shaped bottle

DM/035072 No 4 · WIPO · disclosed 1996-02-29

National designDesign 2

male torso-shaped bottle

942417-001 · French INPI · disclosed 1997-05-02

National designDesign 3

male torso-shaped bottle

942417-002 · French INPI · disclosed 1997-05-02

Trade mark

French three-dimensional mark for a male torso-shaped bottle

95 587 225 · French INPI · disclosed 1995-10-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)Article 25(1)(e)

Argument summary

  • Applicant alleged lack of individual character over three earlier torso-shaped designs and invoked an earlier French 3D trade mark under Article 25(1)(e).
  • Holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division found the earlier mark and contested design visually dissimilar overall, with only limited conceptual overlap, so no likelihood of confusion was established.
  • The Division also found the contested design produced a different overall impression from the closest prior design, so it retained individual character and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000114621

vs SELEX TRADING

2022-08-16Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)099
000114521

vs CRIS-TIM COMPANIE DE FAMILIE SRL

2021-09-08Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)099
000114943

vs Zou Chunliang

2021-08-03Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)099
000010730

vs BEVERAGES Mark Limited

2018-06-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)099
000127595

vs Shenzhen Beipengxing Technology Co., Ltd

2025-04-15Art 25(1)(b)097
000126496

vs Jiangmen Xinhui Zhenghua Ironware Co., Ltd.

2025-03-07Art 25(1)(b)097
000118717

vs "СИ ЕН ДЖИ ТРАК БЪЛГАРИЯ" ООД

2024-05-24Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)097
000119700

vs Guohua He

2023-10-29Art 25(1)(b)097