DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002647040-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-08-26

000114401

Contested design: 002647040-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application against registered Community design No 002647040-0001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

1. La demande en nullité à l’encontre du dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré nº 002647040-0001 est rejetée. 2. La demanderesse supporte les frais de la titulaire, fixés à 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Grassy Handels GmbH & Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

L.-F. Schönherr-Straße 32, 08523 Plauen, Allemagne

Represented by

Patentanwaltskanzlei Dr. Carmen Steiniger

Carmen Steiniger

Holder · RCD owner

ID PLUS S.A.

Belgium (BE)

Horzelstraat 100, 1180 Brussel, Belgique

Represented by

Cabinet Bede S.A.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 3(a)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested RCD did not show a single design under Article 3(a) because the seven views depicted different product parts or inconsistent folding variants.
  • The holder replied that the figures showed the same baby sleeping-bag foot cuff from different angles and open or closed positions, and filed supporting evidence.
  • The Invalidity Division held the registered views were sufficiently clear, coherent, and identifiable as one part of one product despite their abstraction and differing perspectives.
  • The Division found no obvious contradiction between the views, concluded the contested RCD met the definition of a design, and rejected the invalidity application.

Deciding panel

  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberJessica LEWIS
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000123935

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18025
000123916

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18025
000120862

vs Dongguan Zhicheng Lighting Co., Ltd.

2024-11-06025
000122915

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25025
000122914

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25025
000121459

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-09025
000121479

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-08025
000121478

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-04025