DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001718792-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-09-22

000113821

Contested design: 001718792-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 001718792-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Julien Srilanvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Am Greut 4a, 91595 Burgoberbach, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Carol Baxter

United Kingdom (GB)

Fairwinds, 18 Victory Road, West Mersea, Colchester CO5 8LX, United Kingdom

Prior art cited (2)

National designD1

Right angle shower mat

French Design No. 021610-002 · French design database / Designview · disclosed 2002-07-19

National designD2

shower mat

French Design No. 030165-002 · French design database / Designview · disclosed 2006-02-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested shower mat design lacked novelty over two earlier French design registrations disclosed before the 11/06/2010 filing date.
  • The holder replied that key shape differences were significant and that some shared features were technically dictated by the need to fit a standard square-base shower.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted D1 and D2 as disclosed prior designs but found the contested design's curved external border and broader radius materially different from both earlier mats.
  • Because no identical prior design was shown and no other invalidity ground was pursued, the application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.11

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127357

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000127356

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-12Art 25(1)(b)067
000127340

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-06Art 25(1)(b)067
000121199

vs MANUTTI BVBA

2024-05-16Art 25(1)(b)067
000120918

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120869

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120920

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120919

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067