DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008309181-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-10

000115867

Contested design: 008309181-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holders must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008309181-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holders bear the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Love Sports Technology Co., LTDvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

SimplyWork 46D, Tianshucang Floor 4th, Wangkexinghuo Online South No.2, Wuhe Road,Bantian Street, Longgang District, Shen Zhen 518000, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Tong Yang SLU

Holder · RCD owner

Weiya Zhangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Jiedao Zhen Jiguan, Shipodian Town Yu'an District Liuan City Anhui 237131, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

amazon.de listing for a 27.3 cm kitchen knife

ASIN B08GKFN6M7 · amazon.de · disclosed 2020-08-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested kitchen knife design lacked novelty and individual character because an identical knife was offered on amazon.de before the filing date.
  • The holders filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the amazon.de listing as prior public disclosure and found the differences in handle color, wood grain, and blade indentations immaterial.
  • The contested design was found identical to the prior disclosure, so the application was upheld and the design invalidated with costs against the holders.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088