DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008189229-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-15

000114923

Contested design: 008189229-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 0081892290005 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ningbo Let it Be Arts and Craft Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Donya Village Qiuai Town Yinzhou District, Ningo, Volksrepublik China

Represented by

Alberto Maria Giordano

Holder · RCD owner

WARIMEX Waren-Import Export Handels-GmbH

Germany (DE)

Chiara-Ambra-Platz 1, 77743 Neuried, Deutschland

Represented by

Die Patenterie GbR

Prior art cited (1)

National designD1

hairbrush

Chinese design registration No. 305890757 (application No. 202030095767.3) · Chinese design register / DesignView · disclosed 2020-06-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(2)Article 7(3)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier Chinese design D1, published before the contested RCD filing date.
  • The holder argued the prior disclosure should be disregarded under Article 7(2) and (3) because of confidentiality and bad faith, and in any event the designs created a different overall impression.
  • The Division found the holder had not proven confidentiality, abusive conduct, or other grounds to exclude D1 from consideration, so the earlier Chinese design counted as a prior disclosure.
  • Comparing the two hairbrush designs, the Division held their shared figure-eight form, spiral frames, bristles, and central Z-shaped element dominated the overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld in full, the RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

04.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131844

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000130166

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000131548

vs Wenwei Ding

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000131585

vs NOVOWISE LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000129185

vs Wenzhou Lingzhan Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
0001288952025-07-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000127815

vs Daniel-Vasile Ilie

2025-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048