DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008189229-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-15

000114941

Contested design: 008189229-0002

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the registered Community design No 0081892290002 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 0081892290002 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ningbo Let it Be Arts and Craft Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Donya Village Qiuai Town Yinzhou District, Ningo, Volksrepublik China

Represented by

Alberto Maria Giordano

Holder · RCD owner

WARIMEX Waren-Import Export Handels-GmbH

Germany (DE)

Chiara-Ambra-Platz 1, 77743 Neuried, Deutschland

Represented by

Die Patenterie GbR

Prior art cited (1)

National designD1

hairbrush

Chinese design registration No 305890757 · Chinese design register / DesignView · disclosed 2020-06-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(2)Article 7(3)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier Chinese hairbrush design D1 published on 2020-06-30.
  • Holder invoked Article 7 confidentiality and grace-period protection, disputed prior disclosure in the EU, and argued the contested design remained new and distinctive.
  • The Division found the holder's witness evidence alone did not prove abusive disclosure or breach of confidence, so D1 counted as prior art.
  • Despite differences in texture, material, openings, and bristles, both hairbrushes created the same overall impression through the figure-eight body, spiral frames, and central Z-shaped element.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

04.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131844

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000130166

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000131548

vs Wenwei Ding

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000131585

vs NOVOWISE LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000129185

vs Wenzhou Lingzhan Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
0001288952025-07-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000127815

vs Daniel-Vasile Ilie

2025-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048