DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008483937-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-16

000115829

Contested design: 008483937-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holders must bear the costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008483937-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holders bear the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Love Sports Technology Co, LTDvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

SimplyWork 46D, Tianshucang Floor 4th, Wangkexinghuo Online South No.2, Wuhe Road, Bantian Street, Longgang District, Shen Zhen 518000, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Tong Yang SLU

Holder · RCD owner

Weiya Zhangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Jiedao Zhen Jiguan, Shipodian Town Yu’an District Liuan City Anhui 237131, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Amazon listing for a camping knife ('Promithi Fixed Knife D2 Stealing Japanese Outdoor Knife, 60hrc Vacuum Heat Treatment Camping Knife')

ASIN B081SSMJ2Z · amazon.de · disclosed 2019-11-20

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an Amazon.de listing for an identical camping knife available since 20/11/2019.
  • The holders filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon.de printout as sufficient proof of disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR before the contested design's filing date.
  • Comparing the designs directly, the Division found only immaterial differences and held that the contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid in full, and the holders were ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088