DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007914726-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-12-02

000112762

Contested design: 007914726-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 007914726-0002 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Lukmebel Spółka z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnościąvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Piotra Potworowskiego 19E, 63-600 Kępno, Poland

Represented by

Tomasz Szelwiga

Holder · RCD owner

Cama Design Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Sp. K.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Kominy, ul. Jastrzębia 16, 87-300 Brodnica, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

TV - ART Oak Artisan loft TV bench / piece of furniture

Allegro offer No. 9118310897 · Allegro.pl · disclosed 2020-04-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on its Allegro listing for the TV-ART Oak Artisan loft product from 3 April 2020.
  • The holder said its RTV WOOD design had been disclosed earlier by the designers and successor in title during the Article 7(2) grace period, so the applicant's design was attributable disclosure.
  • The Division accepted the holder's Allegro, invoice, assignment, and reseller evidence as showing disclosure by the designers from 24 May 2019 within the grace period.
  • Because the applicant's relied-on design was excluded under Article 7(2), disclosure of a valid prior design was not proven and the invalidity application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI – ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127357

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000127356

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-12Art 25(1)(b)067
000127340

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-06Art 25(1)(b)067
000121199

vs MANUTTI BVBA

2024-05-16Art 25(1)(b)067
000120918

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120869

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120920

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120919

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067