DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008338883-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-12-02

000116287

Contested design: 008338883-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0083388830002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Haodan HUvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 401, Unit 3, Building 7, Yunshan Xiao Qu, Yunshan Street, Lanxi City, Zhejiang, People’s republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Qiqiang Zhangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 25, Xicongluo Village, Shibaitou Township, Lin County, Shanxi 033200, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Lawgical, S.L.P

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 1

Amazon listing for a 'Viking knife'

ASIN B08L4PMZ7Q · Amazon · disclosed 2020-10-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested kitchen-knife design lacked novelty and individual character because a similar 'Viking knife' had been disclosed on Amazon from 13 October 2020.
  • The applicant relied on an Amazon printout and customer-review evidence; the holder filed no observations and left the application undefended.
  • The Invalidity Division found the Amazon evidence sufficient to prove disclosure and held that the prior and contested designs shared the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The Division concluded that the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR, upheld the application, and declared the design invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088