DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002732610-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-05-11

000117128

Contested design: 002732610-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0027326100003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Бовал 7 ООДvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

ж.к Зона Б-18, бл.6, вх.1, ет.12, ап.49, 1309 София, Bulgaria

Holder · RCD owner

Лъкилокс Адvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

Бул. Илиянци № 123, 1220 София, Bulgaria

Represented by

Milena Lyubenova Georgieva-Tabakova

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

unlocking instrument / lock pick depicted in a Facebook snapshot

Facebook account of Mr Vladimir Kirev · Facebook · disclosed 2013-02-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, arguing that the contested lock-picking instrument had already been publicly disclosed before the filing date.
  • It relied mainly on a Facebook snapshot dated 28 February 2013 and a Bulgarian commercial register extract linking the account holder to the design holder.
  • The holder filed no observations, so the disclosure evidence and the applicant's identification of the prior design went unrebutted.
  • The Invalidity Division found the earlier and contested designs identical apart from immaterial colour and engraving differences, so the contested design was not new and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088