DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004764686-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-06-03

000116468

Contested design: 004764686-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (partial)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is invalid in its registered form but is maintained in the register in the amended form shown.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 004764686-0001 wird in der eingetragenen Form für nichtig erklärt. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 004764686-0001 wird in folgender geänderter Form im Register beibehalten:

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Worldfinest GmbHvia PDF extraction

Austria (AT)

Breitenleerstraße 255, 1220 Wien, Österreich

Holder · RCD owner

Eitan Babadostowvia PDF extraction

Austria (AT)

Rossauer Lände 25/5, 1090 Wien, Österreich

Represented by

Stephan Winklbauer

Prior art cited (1)

Trade mark

stylised "VODKA AUSTRIA" mark for vodka

Unionsmarke Nr. 016708711 · EUIPO database · disclosed 2017-08-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 3(a)Article 25(1)(e)Article 9(1)(b)Article 25(6)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested design lacked a clear, unitary subject matter under Article 3(a) and also used an earlier distinctive EU trade mark, creating a likelihood of confusion.
  • The holder said the views consistently showed one bottle design, claimed consent for use of the mark, and requested maintenance in amended form after removing the words "VODKA AUSTRIA".
  • The Invalidity Division rejected the non-design objection, finding the representations sufficiently coherent and the design clearly identifiable as one product.
  • It upheld the Article 25(1)(e) ground because the design used a sign highly similar to the earlier EU trade mark for slightly similar goods, creating a likelihood of confusion.
  • The design was invalidated as registered but maintained in amended form after deletion of the disputed word elements; costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
0001164692022-06-08REUD partially invalidatedArt 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)0910
000114521

vs CRIS-TIM COMPANIE DE FAMILIE SRL

2021-09-08Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)097
000009949

vs Przedsiębiorstwo Drobiarskie Grzegorz Wyrębski

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)095
000009948

vs Przedsiębiorstwo Drobiarskie Grzegorz Wyrębski

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)095
000117458

vs TECHTEX SRL

2025-10-14Art 25(1)(e)095
000123774

vs Gusta Garden GmbH

2024-11-06Art 25(1)(a)095
000124459

vs Gusta Garden GmbH

2024-10-04Art 25(1)(a)095
000118717

vs "СИ ЕН ДЖИ ТРАК БЪЛГАРИЯ" ООД

2024-05-24Art 25(1)(e)095