DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005947660-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-06-16

000114642

Contested design: 005947660-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 005947660-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Andreas Feldevia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Josef-Haydn-Str. 4, 56288 Kastellaun, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Yueqing Fivestar Hardware Tools Factoryvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Zhiguang Village, Liushi Town, Yueqing City, Zhejiang Province 325604, China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Self-adjusting wire ferrule crimping tool set / crimping pliers shown on Amazon.de

ASIN B01J5KTA06 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2017-01-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier crimping-tool design disclosed on Amazon.de before the filing date.
  • The holder challenged disclosure, arguing the ASIN link now showed a different product, the review image was incomplete, and the online evidence could have been manipulated.
  • The Division held the review and listing evidence, assessed together, sufficiently proved prior online disclosure under Article 7(1) and found no significant overall-impression differences between the designs.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b); novelty was not examined further.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088