DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007465836-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-06-20

000116267

Contested design: 007465836-0005

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 007465836-0005 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Chaline Liuvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Volmerswerther Str. 107, 41468 Neuss, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Weihang Xu

China (CN)

First Shop, A Building, New City Garden, No.9, Jianshe Road, Xinhua Street, Huadu District, Guangzhou, China

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use⚠ rejected as evidence

alleged earlier backpack/bag model ('O. VILLAVI - Outdoor 301-6')

Refs. 301-6 / 306-1; invoices 21500140, 21500158, 21800062, 221000081 · L.C.C GmbH and CALIA GmbH invoices; Petra Stiewe affidavit; undated product picture

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested bag design lacked novelty because the same model had been sold and exhibited since at least 2008 before the 31 December 2019 filing date.
  • Holder replied that the evidence did not reliably identify or date a single earlier design and, in any event, the compared products differed in colour, branding, shape and visible features.
  • The Division found the invoices, affidavit and undated picture did not objectively prove effective prior disclosure of one clearly identified earlier design under Article 7 CDR.
  • It added that even if disclosure had been proven, the front-view image of the alleged prior blue backpack did not show all features and did not establish identity with the contested design.
  • The application was therefore rejected and the applicant was ordered to bear the holder's fixed representation costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124157

vs Invented Here B.V.

2025-03-07Art 25(1)(b)037
000124416

vs Wenbo Huang

2025-01-28Art 25(1)(b)037
000121569

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-06-12Art 25(1)(b)037
000121529

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-31Art 25(1)(b)037
000121525

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-24Art 25(1)(b)037
000121526

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-24Art 25(1)(b)037
000121528

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-23Art 25(1)(b)037
000121568

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-23Art 25(1)(b)037