DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008352355-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-07-07

000117592

Contested design: 008352355-0007

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008352355-0007 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Fabryki Mebli "Forte" S.A.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Biała 1, 07-300 Ostrów Mazowiecka, Poland

Represented by

Kancelaria GWW

Michał Tuszyński

Holder · RCD owner

Guangzhou Linyi Trading Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Room 501, No. 3, 5th Lane, Qishan First Street, Dayuan, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Tong Yang SLU

Prior art cited (2)

Catalogattachment 1⚠ rejected as evidence

TEZAUR TZRB211 desk

M.O.W furniture catalogue · M.O.W furniture catalogue · disclosed 2019-09-15

Catalogattachment 2⚠ rejected as evidence

TEZAUR TZRB21B3 desk

M.O.W furniture catalogue · M.O.W furniture catalogue · disclosed 2020-09-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested desk lacked novelty and individual character because it had offered and sold the same-shaped TEZAUR desk since 2019, before the filing date.
  • Applicant relied on two M.O.W. catalogue excerpts and embedded product images; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division held the catalogues and images did not prove effective public disclosure because distribution, audience, and circumstances of availability were not objectively established.
  • Without proven disclosure under Article 7, the earlier design could not defeat novelty or individual character, so the invalidity application failed.
  • The application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's representation costs fixed at EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127357

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000127356

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-12Art 25(1)(b)067
000127340

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-06Art 25(1)(b)067
000121199

vs MANUTTI BVBA

2024-05-16Art 25(1)(b)067
000120918

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120868

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120869

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120919

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067