DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008035000-0011

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-07-29

000115929

Contested design: 008035000-0011

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 008035000-0011 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Crocs, Inc.via PDF extraction

United States (US)

13601 Via Varra, Broomfield Colorado 80020, Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika

Represented by

Fieldfisher LLP

Holder · RCD owner

HSM Schuhmarketing GmbH

Germany (DE)

Werksstr. 15, 45527 Hattingen, Deutschland

Represented by

Osborne Clarke

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

Crocs LiteRide Clog, item 204592

https://www-crocs.fr/p/literide-cloq/204592.html · crocs.fr / crocs.eu websites

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over prior design D1, a Crocs LiteRide Clog disclosed online before the contested filing date.
  • The holder argued the contested design was new and had individual character, and denied that D1 had been validly disclosed.
  • The Division accepted that D1 had been disclosed on the cited Crocs webpages through reviews dating from 2018 and 2019, before the contested design's filing date.
  • The Division found visible differences in the outsole, insole, heel strap fastening, and sole profile, so the designs were neither identical nor produced the same overall impression.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000123916

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000123935

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000120862

vs Dongguan Zhicheng Lighting Co., Ltd.

2024-11-06Art 25(1)(b)027
000122914

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000122915

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000121459

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-09Art 25(1)(b)027
000121479

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-08Art 25(1)(b)027
000121478

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-04Art 25(1)(b)027