DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006412573-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-08-18

000116690

Contested design: 006412573-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of Registered Community design No 0064125730001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Mafi ABvia PDF extraction

Sweden (SE)

Seljavägen 15, 792 95 Mora, Sweden

Represented by

Zacco Sweden AB

Holder · RCD owner

SRK Tele Energy India Private Limited

IN

Unit No. 609, Tower C, Unitech Business Zone Sector 50, Gurgaon Haryana 122018, India

Represented by

Landmark B.V.

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

fastening devices

RCD No 0053029240001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2018-06-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) based on its earlier RCD No 0053029240001, alleging the contested fastening-device design lacked novelty and individual character.
  • The applicant argued the designs were effectively identical apart from minor fastening-point differences and submitted other market examples to show broad design freedom.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD but found the contested design's transverse asymmetry, different peripheral edge inclinations, missing transverse ridge detail, and grey material appearance created a different overall impression.
  • Because the differences were not immaterial, the contested design retained individual character and novelty, so the invalidity application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)087
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)087
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)087
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)087
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)087
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)087
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)087
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)087