DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000016407-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-08-26

000117918

Contested design: 000016407-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 000016407-0002 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

I&Svia PDF extraction

Belgium (BE)

Vijverwegel 60, 9090 Melle, Belgium

Represented by

Fencer

Holder · RCD owner

Europochette, Naamloze vennootschap

Belgium (BE)

Kasteleinstraat 13A, 9150 Kruibeke, Belgium

Represented by

Gevers

Prior art cited (2)

CatalogD1

Kangaroo folded napkin cutlery pouch shown in the García de Pou 2000 catalogue

García de Pou 2000 catalogue · disclosed 2000-12-31

CatalogD2

Kangaroo folded napkin cutlery pouch shown in the García de Pou 2000 catalogue

García de Pou 2000 catalogue · disclosed 2000-12-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over cutlery pouch designs D1 and D2 disclosed in the García de Pou 2000 catalogue, supported by additional web and court materials.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the 2000 catalogue as prior disclosure but disregarded undated web and Google materials and untranslated letters as insufficient proof of earlier disclosure.
  • It found the contested sealed cardboard-like pouch produced a different overall impression from the folded napkin prior designs, so the design remained novel and had individual character; the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131525

vs Berentzen-Gruppe Aktiengesellschaft

2026-03-26Art 25(1)(b)097
000131526

vs Berentzen-Gruppe Aktiengesellschaft

2026-03-26Art 25(1)(b)097
000131506

vs Berentzen-Gruppe Aktiengesellschaft

2026-03-26Art 25(1)(b)097
000131524

vs Berentzen-Gruppe Aktiengesellschaft

2026-03-26Art 25(1)(b)097
000131527

vs Berentzen-Gruppe Aktiengesellschaft

2026-03-26Art 25(1)(b)097
000131544

vs Berentzen-Gruppe Aktiengesellschaft

2026-03-26Art 25(1)(b)097
000131528

vs Berentzen-Gruppe Aktiengesellschaft

2026-03-26Art 25(1)(b)097
000131504

vs Berentzen-Gruppe Aktiengesellschaft

2026-03-24Art 25(1)(b)097