DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008037196-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-04

000119018

Contested design: 008037196-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, Registered Community design No 008037196-0002 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008037196-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Steven Wurmbachvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Hannoversche Straße 54b, 30916 Isernhagen, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Shaoan Xie

China (CN)

7th Floor, Building A, Honglianying Technology Park, Sili Road, Guanlan, Longhua New District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Tong Yang Slu

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

polishing brush offered on Amazon

ASIN B01 M68 NIN5 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2016-10-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested polishing brush design lacked novelty and individual character because a near-identical wire brush had been publicly offered online since October 2016.
  • The holder was invited to submit observations but did not reply, so the invalidity application was undefended.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Amazon.de product listing with ASIN B01 M68 NIN5 as sufficient internet disclosure dating from 23/10/2016.
  • Comparing the designs, the Division found them practically identical overall and held that minor differences in the cup interior did not create a different overall impression.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

04.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131844

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000130166

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000131548

vs Wenwei Ding

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000131585

vs NOVOWISE LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000129185

vs Wenzhou Lingzhan Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
0001288952025-07-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000127815

vs Daniel-Vasile Ilie

2025-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048