DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004352300-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-12

000117050

Contested design: 004352300-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 004352300-0001 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Plásticos Industriales y Comerciales de Alfarrasi, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Picda, Crta. Nacional 340, s/n, 46893 Alfarrasi, Spanien

Represented by

Garrigues IP, S.L.P

Holder · RCD owner

Papier-Mettler KG

Germany (DE)

Hochwaldstrasse 22, 54497 Morbach, Deutschland

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureD1

plastic shopping bag

publicidadmerchandising.blogspot.com/2016/04/publicidad-merchandising_21.html · publicidadmerchandising.blogspot.com · disclosed 2016-04-21

Web disclosureD2

plastic shopping bag

publicidadmerchandising.blogspot.com/2016/04/publicidad-merchandising_21.html · publicidadmerchandising.blogspot.com · disclosed 2016-04-21

Web disclosureD3

plastic shopping bag

Facebook · disclosed 2016-06-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested bag design lacked novelty and individual character because earlier bags D1-D20 already disclosed the same essential form.
  • The holder replied that the contested reusable bag created a different overall impression and that the invalidity application should be dismissed.
  • The Division accepted disclosure only for D1-D3; D4-D20 and the remaining materials were disregarded as insufficiently identified or evidenced.
  • Comparing D1-D3 with the contested design, the Division found the material, handles, seams, shape, and printed decoration created a different overall impression and no identical prior design.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127595

vs Shenzhen Beipengxing Technology Co., Ltd

2025-04-15Art 25(1)(b)097
000126496

vs Jiangmen Xinhui Zhenghua Ironware Co., Ltd.

2025-03-07Art 25(1)(b)097
000119700

vs Guohua He

2023-10-29Art 25(1)(b)097
000119221

vs Aniceto Canamasas Puigbo

2023-10-22Art 25(1)(b)097
000121263

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121319

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121318

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121320

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097