DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004352300-0014

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-13

000117033

Contested design: 004352300-0014

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against RCD No 004352300-0014 is rejected.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 004352300-0014 wird zurückgewiesen.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Plásticos Industriales y Comerciales de Alfarrasi, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Picda, Crta. Nacional 340, s/n, 46893 Alfarrasi, Spanien

Represented by

Garrigues IP, S.L.P

Holder · RCD owner

Papier-Mettler KG

Germany (DE)

Hochwaldstrasse 22, 54497 Morbach, Deutschland

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

shopping bag shown in The Blue Bag article

https://thesmalls.com/article/the-blue-bag-film-honours-ikeas-frakta-like-the-icon-it-is · thesmalls.com · disclosed 2017-07-05

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

shopping bag shown in a tweet

Twitter · disclosed 2016-04-11

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

shopping bag shown on a website entry

website · disclosed 2012-03-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant invoked lack of novelty and individual character based on several earlier bag designs and accompanying internet evidence.
  • The holder argued the application did not properly identify each prior design and that later-added material could not broaden the case.
  • The Division found the asserted prior designs were not precisely identified or matched to adequate disclosure evidence, and declarations did not prove design disclosure.
  • Without a proven earlier design under Article 7, the invalidity request was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127595

vs Shenzhen Beipengxing Technology Co., Ltd

2025-04-15Art 25(1)(b)097
000126496

vs Jiangmen Xinhui Zhenghua Ironware Co., Ltd.

2025-03-07Art 25(1)(b)097
000119700

vs Guohua He

2023-10-29Art 25(1)(b)097
000119221

vs Aniceto Canamasas Puigbo

2023-10-22Art 25(1)(b)097
000121263

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121319

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121318

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121320

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097