DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004352300-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-13

000117069

Contested design: 004352300-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 004352300-0002 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Plásticos Industriales y Comerciales de Alfarrasi, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Picda, Crta. Nacional 340, s/n, 46893 Alfarrasi, Spanien

Represented by

Garrigues IP, S.L.P

Holder · RCD owner

Papier-Mettler KG

Germany (DE)

Hochwaldstrasse 22, 54497 Morbach, Deutschland

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

Tragetasche

Twitter · disclosed 2017-03-30

Web disclosureD2

Tragetasche

Twitter · disclosed 2017-03-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, arguing the contested shopping bag had already been disclosed through earlier bags, especially D1 and D2.
  • The holder argued the design remained new and individual, stressing differences in form, handle attachment, seams, materials, and color presentation.
  • The Division accepted D1 and D2 as disclosed but excluded the remaining alleged prior designs because they were not properly identified or evidenced.
  • It found the contested design created a different overall impression from D1 and D2, so neither lack of individual character nor lack of novelty was established.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127595

vs Shenzhen Beipengxing Technology Co., Ltd

2025-04-15Art 25(1)(b)097
000126496

vs Jiangmen Xinhui Zhenghua Ironware Co., Ltd.

2025-03-07Art 25(1)(b)097
000119700

vs Guohua He

2023-10-29Art 25(1)(b)097
000119221

vs Aniceto Canamasas Puigbo

2023-10-22Art 25(1)(b)097
000121263

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121319

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121318

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121320

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097