DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004352300-0012

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-13

000117075

Contested design: 004352300-0012

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against RCD No 004352300-0012 is rejected.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 004352300-0012 wird zurückgewiesen.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Plásticos Industriales y Comerciales de Alfarrasi, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Picda, Crta. Nacional 340, s/n, 46893 Alfarrasi, Spanien

Represented by

Garrigues IP, S.L.P

Holder · RCD owner

Papier-Mettler KG

Germany (DE)

Hochwaldstrasse 22, 54497 Morbach, Deutschland

Prior art cited (6)

Web disclosureD1

partial view of a plastic shopping bag shown in a weblog post

publicidadmerchandising.blogspot.com/2016/04/publicidad-merchandising_21.html · publicidadmerchandising.blogspot.com · disclosed 2016-04-21

Web disclosureD2⚠ rejected as evidence

plastic bags shown in a tweet

Twitter · disclosed 2015-03-31

Web disclosureD3⚠ rejected as evidence

plastic bag shown in a Facebook post

Facebook · disclosed 2016-06-28

Web disclosureD4⚠ rejected as evidence

video still of a shopping bag uploaded by rtve.es/agencias

website · disclosed 2009-09-01

Web disclosureD5⚠ rejected as evidence

shopping bag shown on a website entry

website · disclosed 2011-01-11

Web disclosureD6⚠ rejected as evidence

various shopping bags shown on a website entry

website · disclosed 2012-08-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the visible handle area of the bag lacked novelty and individual character over earlier bag disclosures.
  • The holder said the protected subject matter was the shown bag portion and that the earlier cited bags created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted disclosure only of D1 and found its translucent bag, colored horseshoe-shaped handles and missing seam differed clearly from the contested white handle area.
  • It rejected the attacks based on both individual character and novelty, so the invalidity application failed.

Deciding panel

  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127595

vs Shenzhen Beipengxing Technology Co., Ltd

2025-04-15Art 25(1)(b)097
000126496

vs Jiangmen Xinhui Zhenghua Ironware Co., Ltd.

2025-03-07Art 25(1)(b)097
000119700

vs Guohua He

2023-10-29Art 25(1)(b)097
000119221

vs Aniceto Canamasas Puigbo

2023-10-22Art 25(1)(b)097
000121263

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121319

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121318

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121320

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097