DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007004171-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-02-03

000116848

Contested design: 007004171-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0070041710001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

CM München GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Viktor-Frankl-Str. 11, 86899 Landsberg am Lech, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Airwair International Limited

United Kingdom (GB)

Cobb’s Lane, Wollaston, Wellingborough, Northamptonshire NN29 7SW, United Kingdom

Represented by

Hogan Lovells

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use⚠ rejected as evidence

Dr. Martens '2976 Quad' shoe design / sole

Warning letter dated 2021-08-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested shoe sole design lacked novelty and individual character over the earlier Dr. Martens 2976 Quad model allegedly developed in 2013.
  • Holder replied that the contested sole was markedly thicker, the applicant wrongly relied on unclaimed colours and upper features, and the informed user would notice the sole thickness.
  • The Division held the applicant had not proved public disclosure of the alleged earlier design because the warning letter did not show when or how it was made available to the public.
  • Without proof of disclosure under Article 7, the Office did not assess novelty or individual character further and rejected the invalidity application.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000123916

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000123935

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000120862

vs Dongguan Zhicheng Lighting Co., Ltd.

2024-11-06Art 25(1)(b)027
000122914

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000122915

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000121459

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-09Art 25(1)(b)027
000121479

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-08Art 25(1)(b)027
000121478

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-04Art 25(1)(b)027