DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004014124-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-02-24

000117597

Contested design: 004014124-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application against registered Community design No 004014124-0001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

1. La demande en nullité à l’encontre du dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré nº 004014124-0001 est rejetée. 2. La demanderesse supporte les frais de la titulaire, fixés à 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Lidl Nederland GmbHvia PDF extraction

Netherlands (NL)

Huizermaatweg 45, 1273 NA Huizen, Pays-Bas

Holder · RCD owner

Morel S.A.S. à associé uniquevia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Zi rue Blaise Pascal, 39000 Lons-Le-Saunier, France

Represented by

Novagraaf France

Prior art cited (10)

PatentSKW 5

shade sail with a decorative light source

WO 2017 220 886 · PCT publication · disclosed 2017-12-28

Web disclosureD1⚠ rejected as evidence

square shade sail

Amazon

Web disclosureD2

square shade sail

ASIN B008041FHA · Amazon.de

Registered RCDD3

square shade sail

RCD 000872056-0009

Registered RCDD4

square shade sail

RCD 000177407-0001

Registered RCDD5

square shade sail

Registered RCDD6

square shade sail

RCD 001055461-0003

Web disclosureD7⚠ rejected as evidence

square shade sail

Amazon

CatalogD8⚠ rejected as evidence

square shade sail

catalog

CatalogD9⚠ rejected as evidence

square shade sail

catalog

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 8(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested design lacked novelty and individual character and that its essential features were solely dictated by technical function.
  • It relied on a patent application, Amazon listings, catalog extracts, and earlier registered designs to attack the shape, dotted lighting pattern, and construction details.
  • The holder replied that the design claimed a visually distinctive luminous shade sail, and that the cited disclosures were either unproven or created a different overall impression.
  • The Invalidity Division found technical exclusivity unproven, accepted only some prior disclosures, found no identity or same overall impression, rejected the application, and awarded costs to the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberJessica LEWIS
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124157

vs Invented Here B.V.

2025-03-07Art 25(1)(b)037
000124416

vs Wenbo Huang

2025-01-28Art 25(1)(b)037
000121569

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-06-12Art 25(1)(b)037
000121529

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-31Art 25(1)(b)037
000121526

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-24Art 25(1)(b)037
000121525

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-24Art 25(1)(b)037
000121568

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-23Art 25(1)(b)037
000121527

vs PANAGIOTIS SPILIOPOULOS

2024-05-23Art 25(1)(b)037