DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000910666-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-03-22

000118077

Contested design: 000910666-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 000910666-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Reach Surgical, INCvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

120 Xinxing Road, West Zone, TEDA Tianjin 300462, China

Holder · RCD owner

Cilag GmbH Internationalvia PDF extraction

Switzerland (CH)

Gubelstrasse 34, 6300 Zug, Switzerland

Prior art cited (2)

PatentD1

handle for surgical instrument

United States design patent No D509,589 S · United States design patent · disclosed 2005-09-13

Registered RCDD2

hand tools

Community design registration No 000526637-0002 · Office's design database · disclosed 2006-07-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier designs D1 and D2.
  • The holder argued both prior designs created different appearances and that the informed user was a highly attentive trained medical practitioner.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of D1 and D2 but found neither prior design identical to the contested design nor capable of producing the same overall impression.
  • The invalidity grounds under Article 25(1)(b) CDR were not proven, so the application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

24.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000117392

vs CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL

2023-05-15Art 25(1)(b)247
000118097

vs CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL

2023-05-15Art 25(1)(b)247
000117453

vs SHANGHAI TENGXIANG TRAVEL PRODUCTS CO.,LTD

2023-03-20Art 25(1)(b)247
000117372

vs Biovico Sp. z o.o.

2023-02-23Art 25(1)(b)247
000115342

vs Elsa Vermögens- und Beteiligungs AG

2022-06-15Art 25(1)(b)247
000108861

vs Sofiane Lozano IBANEZ

2021-07-22Art 25(1)(b)247
000107461

vs CHANGCHUN XIA

2020-05-08Art 25(1)(b)247
000105480

vs FBGC Limited

2019-08-13Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)247