DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008764963-0008

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-04-12

000119701

Contested design: 008764963-0008

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0087649630008 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Lian Chenvia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Calle de la Marga, s/n Pol. Ind. Nuestra Señora del Rosario, 45224 Seseña Nuevo (Toledo), Spain

Holder · RCD owner

Guohua He

China (CN)

Unit 5, Building 3, Rattle Garden, Ersanli Street, Yiwu City, Zhejiang Province, China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (3)

Registered RCDD1

blister packages

RCD No 0063436380007 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-04-10

Registered RCDD2

blister packages

RCD No 0063436380003 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-04-10

Registered RCDD3

blister packages

RCD No 0045227870008 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2018-02-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested packaging design lacked individual character over earlier RCDs D1 to D3 because the shared red, blue, black, and white presentation created the same overall impression.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of D1 to D3 through their publication in the Community Designs Bulletin and assessed the informed user and designer freedom in the packaging sector.
  • The Division found the differences in contours and decorative patterns prominent enough to produce a different overall impression, so the contested design retained individual character and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127595

vs Shenzhen Beipengxing Technology Co., Ltd

2025-04-15Art 25(1)(b)097
000126496

vs Jiangmen Xinhui Zhenghua Ironware Co., Ltd.

2025-03-07Art 25(1)(b)097
000119700

vs Guohua He

2023-10-29Art 25(1)(b)097
000119221

vs Aniceto Canamasas Puigbo

2023-10-22Art 25(1)(b)097
000121263

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121319

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121318

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121320

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097