DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008764963-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-04-12

000119723

Contested design: 008764963-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application against the contested RCD is rejected.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0087649630001 is rejected.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Lian Chenvia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Calle de la Marga, s/n Pol. Ind. Nuestra Señora del Rosario, 45224 Seseña Nuevo (Toledo), Spain

Holder · RCD owner

Guohua He

China (CN)

Unit 5, Building 3, Rattle Garden, Ersanli Street, Yiwu City, Zhejiang Province, China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (3)

Registered RCDD1

blister package

RCD No 45227870049 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2018-02-22

Registered RCDD2

blister package

RCD No 45227870036 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2018-02-22

Registered RCDD3

blister package

RCD No 45227870093 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2018-02-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, arguing the contested packaging reused the same red-blue colour scheme and overall appearance of three earlier RCD designs.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of D1-D3 through Bulletin publication, identified a highly attentive informed user, and found high design freedom for packaging.
  • It held that the box or blister structure, contours, background, and animal graphics created different overall impressions, so the contested design retained individual character and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127595

vs Shenzhen Beipengxing Technology Co., Ltd

2025-04-15Art 25(1)(b)097
000126496

vs Jiangmen Xinhui Zhenghua Ironware Co., Ltd.

2025-03-07Art 25(1)(b)097
000119700

vs Guohua He

2023-10-29Art 25(1)(b)097
000119221

vs Aniceto Canamasas Puigbo

2023-10-22Art 25(1)(b)097
000121263

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121319

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121318

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097
000121320

vs MIESZKO S.A.

2023-10-18Art 25(1)(b)097