DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001437388-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-05-31

000119099

Contested design: 001437388-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0014373880001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Gabi Jerczyński SP. K.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Piaski 9A, 63645 Łęka Opatowska, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Henryk Kaczorowski Fabryka Mebli Piaski w spadkuvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Piaski 1C, 63645 Łęka Opatowska, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

corner sofa

RCD No 0025400050024 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2014-10-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier RCD No 0025400050024, arguing the compared corner sofas shared the same essential overall features.
  • The holder argued the contested design was new and individually distinctive, relied on a crowded prior-art field, and pointed to differences in the backrests, seats, armrest, legs and two-tone appearance.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD, found designer freedom high for corner-sofa configuration, and held the claimed market saturation was not dense enough to reduce the importance of visible differences.
  • The Division found the similarities concerned common sofa features, while the differences in freely developed features produced a different overall impression; the invalidity application was therefore rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberAlfonso CID GONZALEZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127357

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000127356

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-12Art 25(1)(b)067
000127340

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-06Art 25(1)(b)067
000121199

vs MANUTTI BVBA

2024-05-16Art 25(1)(b)067
000120918

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120869

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120920

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120919

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067