DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004156909-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-06-13

000119100

Contested design: 004156909-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against RCD No 004156909-0001 is rejected.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 004156909-0001 wird zurückgewiesen.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Crocs, Inc.via PDF extraction

United States (US)

13601 Via Varra, Broomfield Colorado 80020, Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika

Represented by

Fieldfisher LLP

Holder · RCD owner

HSM Schuhmarketing GmbH

Germany (DE)

Werksstr. 15, 45527 Hattingen, Deutschland

Represented by

Marc Barth

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

Schuhe (Clogs-Schuhe)

Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 003385913-0008 · Blatt für Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster · disclosed 2016-09-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier RCD D1 covering shoes, arguing both designs created the same overall impression.
  • Holder argued the contested clog design had sufficient individual character and highlighted multiple differences in the upper, side vents, insole, strap, and outsole.
  • The Division accepted D1 as disclosed, identified the informed user as a shoe consumer familiar with clogs, and found designer freedom generally unrestricted apart from basic footwear constraints.
  • Despite some shared clog features, the Division considered the differences more striking than the similarities and found a different overall impression.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to bear the holder's costs, with no representation costs fixed.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000123916

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000123935

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000120862

vs Dongguan Zhicheng Lighting Co., Ltd.

2024-11-06Art 25(1)(b)027
000122914

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000122915

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000121459

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-09Art 25(1)(b)027
000121479

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-08Art 25(1)(b)027
000121478

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-04Art 25(1)(b)027