DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008182497-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-07

000119438

Contested design: 008182497-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0081824970001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

MYNT Handels und Service GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Werner-Heisenberg-Straße 2, 63263 Neu-Isenburg, Germany

Represented by

Media Kanzlei

Holder · RCD owner

Guiju Fan

China (CN)

5th Floor, Building 612, No. 12, Bagua 2nd Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, Shenzhen, China

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureAttachment 1⚠ rejected as evidence

white mattress protector or cover with corner rubber bands

www.geheimshop.de · www.geheimshop.de · disclosed 2018-08-15

Web disclosureAttachment 2/3⚠ rejected as evidence

Lizhitree waterproof mattress protector offered via Amazon

ASIN B085VNZHMF · Amazon.de · disclosed 2020-03-15

Web disclosureAttachment 4/5⚠ rejected as evidence

LaraTex white waterproof mattress protector with rubber bands in each corner

www.kaufland.de · www.kaufland.de

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested mattress cover lacked novelty and individual character because similar white protectors with corner rubber bands had been marketed since at least 2018.
  • It relied on website, Amazon and Kaufland screenshots to show earlier disclosures; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division found the internet evidence incomplete, undated or insufficiently linked to identifiable full designs, so disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR was not proved.
  • Without proven prior disclosure, the Article 25(1)(b) challenge based on Articles 5 and 6 CDR failed and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.13

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127357

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000127356

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-12Art 25(1)(b)067
000127340

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-06Art 25(1)(b)067
000121199

vs MANUTTI BVBA

2024-05-16Art 25(1)(b)067
000120918

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120869

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120920

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120919

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067