DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009188451-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-25

000120201

Contested design: 009188451-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holders must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009188451-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holders bear the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Iso Trade Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Hangarowa 15, 59220 Legnica Poland

Represented by

Maciej Marian Priebe

Holder · RCD owner

Investigate Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Gustawa Morcinka 15 21, 31762 Krakówm Poland

Represented by

Anna Giercarz

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Voilamart 4PCS Bike Wall Mounted Bike Rack Space Saving Bicycle Wall Hanger Vertical Bike Storage Stand for Indoor Garage Warehouse Black (Max Load 66lb)

https://www.amazon.co.uk; ASIN No B07 H67 3SB6 · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2019-10-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier bicycle-rack designs disclosed online before the filing date.
  • It relied on an Amazon.co.uk product listing with ASIN B07 H67 3SB6, described as first available on 24/10/2019.
  • The holders filed no observations and did not rebut the claimed online disclosure or the comparison evidence.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence as sufficient disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found the compared designs materially identical.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked novelty under Article 5(1)(b) CDR; the Division did not examine individual character further.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.10

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088