DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008840797-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-25

000120862

Contested design: 008840797-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008840797-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

FootActive Germany e.K.via PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

An der Junkerei 48m, 26389 Wilhelmshaven, Germany

Represented by

Ploum

Holder · RCD owner

Dongguan Zhicheng Lighting Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

No. 40, Housha Road, Qiaotou Community, Houjie Town, Dongguan City, China

Represented by

Marinos Cleanthous

Prior art cited (3)

Registered RCDAnnex 1

insoles

Community design registration No 005908761-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-01-09

Web disclosureAnnex 2⚠ rejected as evidence

printouts from a German webpage showing 'FootActive ULTRALITE' insoles in different colours

OtherAnnex 3

images of insoles submitted to show the design corpus

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 005908761-0001, webpage printouts, and alleged prior market disclosures.
  • Holder did not submit observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD bulletin publication, rejected Annex 2 as inadequate web evidence, and found Annex 3 insufficient to prove a crowded design corpus.
  • Despite similarities in the bottom view, additional top and side features and different colours created a different overall impression, so novelty and individual character were upheld.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico DERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000123916

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000123935

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000120862

vs Dongguan Zhicheng Lighting Co., Ltd.

2024-11-06Art 25(1)(b)027
000122914

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000122915

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000121459

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-09Art 25(1)(b)027
000121479

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-08Art 25(1)(b)027
000121478

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-04Art 25(1)(b)027