DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000972385-0012

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-27

000119258

Contested design: 000972385-0012

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 000972385-0012 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Crocs, Inc.via PDF extraction

United States (US)

13601 Via Varra, Broomfield Colorado 80020, Vereinigte Staaten

Represented by

Fieldfisher LLP

Holder · RCD owner

HSM Schuhmarketing GmbH

Germany (DE)

Werksstr. 15, 45527 Hattingen, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

earlier clog design

Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 000859400-0003 · EUIPO eSearch database / Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2008-03-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier RCD No 000859400-0003.
  • The holder argued the contested clog design created a different overall impression and retained individual character despite similarities typical of clogs.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD, identified the informed user as a footwear or clog user, and found the designer's freedom relatively broad.
  • It held the many visible differences in the upper, sole, strap, and hole arrangement outweighed the similarities, so the contested design had individual character.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000123916

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000123935

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000120862

vs Dongguan Zhicheng Lighting Co., Ltd.

2024-11-06Art 25(1)(b)027
000122914

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000122915

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000121459

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-09Art 25(1)(b)027
000121479

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-08Art 25(1)(b)027
000121478

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-04Art 25(1)(b)027